[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "ChessAdmin"]
[Black "Class A"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A22"]
[Annotator "ChessAdmin/Komodo 11.2"]
[PlyCount "84"]
[EventType "game"]
{[%mdl 8256] A22: English Opening: 1...e5 2 Nc3 Nf6} 1. c4 d6 2. Nf3 {this is
actually not played very often and has a relatively weak score (51 percent) in
the database. Black's last move strengthened e5, so Nf3 is less effective than
the alternatives.} (2. Nc3) (2. g3) 2... e5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d3 Be7 5. g3 O-O 6.
Bg2 c6 {Black now has a rather effective version of an Old Indian Defense
setup in place.} 7. O-O h6 {a classic restraining move, preventing ideas of
White using g5.} 8. Rb1 a5 {restraining the idea of the b-pawn advance.} 9. a3
{White insists on the idea.} Re8 10. b4 axb4 11. axb4 Bf8 {part of the point
of the earlier ...Re8, clearing f8 for the bishop, also a common idea in the
Spanish Game / Ruy Lopez.} 12. b5 {the obvious follow-up for White.} d5 {
the correct reaction for Black, who is well-supported in the center.} 13. Qc2
$6 {this does not in fact improve White's prospects any, so it would be better
to go ahead and resolve the pawn tension.} (13. bxc6 bxc6 14. d4 Bf5 $11) 13...
Qe7 {this queen move similarly does not do much for Black, although the idea
of lining up on the e-file is clear.} (13... d4 $5 {is an interesting
alternative, notes Komodo via the Fritz interface.} 14. Nd1 cxb5 15. Rxb5 Nc6
$15) 14. bxc6 $11 bxc6 15. Nxe5 {an unnecessarily complicated tactical idea.} (
15. cxd5 Nxd5 16. Bd2 {and White has a comfortable game.}) 15... Qxe5 $11 16.
Bf4 {regaining the piece via the skewer/double attack on the Nb8.} Qf5 17. e4 {
this is slightly inferior and again unnecessarily complicated.} (17. Bxb8 Bd7
18. Bf4 $11 {and now if} dxc4 {which I was worried about due to the pin on the
d-pawn,} 19. Ne4 cxd3 20. exd3 $11 {and everything is fine.}) 17... dxe4 18.
dxe4 Qe6 19. Rxb8 Rxb8 20. Bxb8 Qxc4 {now the position is imbalanced, with
Black having a passed pawn on the queenside. The engine rates it with only a
slight edge to Black, but I think it's a harder position for White to play, at
least at the Class level.} 21. Rc1 Be6 22. Qb2 Nd7 23. Bf4 g5 24. Nd5 {again
with the unnecessarily complicated theme.} (24. Be3) (24. Bf1 $5) 24... Qa4 {
White has an active position} (24... Qd3) 25. Ra1 Qb5 {Black chooses to force
the queen exchange, as otherwise I would have two minor pieces hanging.} 26.
Qxb5 cxb5 27. Nc7 {forcing additional simplification.} Rc8 28. Nxe6 fxe6 {
my position has now improved strategically, with the two bishops and Black's
pawns less able to protect each other, which should make it easier for me to
play, although technically the game is still balanced.} 29. Be3 b4 30. Ra7 {
active rook placement on the 7th rank.} Nc5 31. f4 $4 {the game-losing blunder.
I neglect the concrete threat Black's advanced b-pawn is capable of making,
which could be easily contained.} (31. Ra5 $11) (31. Bh3 {is also good,
restraining b4-b3 due to the bishop's pressuring of e6.}) 31... gxf4 $19 32.
gxf4 b3 33. Bd4 Rb8 {and now material loss is inevitable for White.} 34. Ra1
Rb4 35. Bc3 (35. Bxc5 Bxc5+ 36. Kf1 b2 37. Rb1 Bd6 $19) 35... Rc4 36. Be5 Nd3
37. Bf1 (37. Bh3 {is not the saving move} Bc5+ 38. Kg2 Kf7 $19) 37... Nxe5 $1 {
well done by Black, giving up the rook for a winning position.} 38. Bxc4 (38.
fxe5 b2 39. Rb1 Bc5+ 40. Kh1 (40. Kg2 Rc2+ 41. Kg3 Bd4 $19) 40... Rc1 $19)
38... Nxc4 39. Ra8 {just desperation at this point.} (39. Rb1 {there is
nothing else anyway} Bc5+ 40. Kg2 b2 {and after ...Bd4 and ...Nd2 I'm lost.})
39... Kf7 40. Ra7+ Kg6 41. Kf2 $2 {a blunder, but it just hastens the
inevitable.} Bc5+ 42. Ke2 Bxa7 0-1
An examination of training and practical concepts for the improving tournament chessplayer
05 June 2018
Annotated Game #189: Unnecessarily complicated
This next tournament game has the recurring theme of unnecessarily complicated moves by White (me). At several points, I see tactical or other ideas which are slightly worse than the simple approach to the position, and choose to go with them. This doesn't lose the game for me - an underdeveloped sense of danger about Black's advanced passed b-pawn does that - but it certainly contributes to setting up the conditions for the game-losing blunder. Some useful lessons in there.
29 May 2018
How Carlsen makes us feel better about chess IV
What phase of your career do you feel you are in?
'I don't know. I feel that I have been in the game for a long time already and I think if you do the right things, you can be good for a very long time. I feel that I am closer to the start than to the end of my prime. I enjoy playing and I still have so much to work on. It's very obvious to me that I can still be much better, and from tournament to tournament I am trying to learn something new about chess or about myself. But it's not easy. I've got to be better now. I had a few poor tournaments last year. Then I felt like I turned myself around, but now I need to take the next steps. I cannot remain stuck at the level I am at now...not only as regards chess, but as regards the combination of chess and psychology'
(From New in Chess 2016-4, interview with Magnus Carlsen after winning Altibox Norway Chess for the first time)
28 May 2018
Annotated Game #188: Simul vs. WIM Sabrina Chevannes
This next game is from a simul played against WIM Sabrina Chevannes at a chess festival. I was pleased to see the London System on the board from my opponent, as I've had good results against it. I handle the initial opening phase well (through move 7), first avoiding, but then running into a similar problem with White penetration of the queenside as occurred in Annotated Game #183. Here the opening variation isn't really the problem, as the queen exchange for Black is fine (unlike in the linked game), but rather recognizing White's opportunity to target the c6-pawn from the side with the rook on the a-file. Luckily my opponent missed this (rather unusual) opportunity as well and the game continued. Other lessons learned from the analysis were the power of the ...e5 break for Black and the need to evaluate better the impacts of key piece exchanges. In the end, I correctly trade off my passed central pawn for one of White's queenside pawns in the endgame and reach a drawn position, which I was happy to take.
[Event "Simul"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Chevannes, Sabrina"]
[Black "ChessAdmin"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "D10"]
[Annotator "ChessAdmin/Komodo 11.2"]
[PlyCount "66"]
[EventDate "2015.03.17"]
[EventType "simul"]
[EventRounds "2"]
{D10: Slav Defence: cxd5 (without early Nf3) and 3 Nc3} 1. d4 d5 2. Bf4 {
an early entry into the London System, although now Bf4 is considered better
than the originally less committal Nf3 in the opening structure. ChessBase
considers the opening a Slav Defense (ECO D10).} Nf6 3. e3 Bf5 {I like playing
this because of the symmetry and increased control of e4, and find it easier
to play as opposed to developing the bishop on the queenside.} (3... e6 {
is the most popular move in the database, no doubt because of all the Queen's
Gambit Declined players.}) 4. c4 c6 {we now have a traditional Slav structure
for Black, versus a non-traditional White setup.} 5. Qb3 {White immediately
hits the queenside, as removing the protector of b7 is the main drawback of
the previous move.} Qb6 {played in the vast majority of games. Black is not
afraid to swap queens.} 6. c5 {this space-gaining push is a natural reaction
and the most played. The trade-off for White is that it eliminates tension in
the center.} Qxb3 7. axb3 {in exchange for the doubled pawns, which are not
much of a weakness since I can't target them easily, White has the semi-open
a-file. However, this is not as much of an issue as in some other Slav
variations, since White also has trouble directly exploiting it.} Nbd7 8. Nc3
e6 {this is too conservative. I should have recognized the ...e5 pawn break
possibility, although in this case it requires some assistance from the Nf6
and creative play; the break is a normal reaction to White's earlier c4-c5
push, which leaves the black pawn on d5 secure.} (8... e5 $5 {this works
because of the Nf6's mobility and the fact that the c5 pawn depends on the d4
pawn for protection. The fact that we are already in an endgame-like position
also means that Black has less to worry about regarding king protection.} 9.
dxe5 Nh5 10. b4 Nxf4 11. exf4 g5 {offering a wing pawn for a central one, a
good deal for Black.} 12. g3 gxf4 13. gxf4 f6 14. exf6 Nxf6 $11 {and Black has
full compensation for the pawn, given better piece activity and the obviously
weak White kingside pawns.}) (8... a6 {is also commonly played in this
position, with good results for Black (56 percent). One example:} 9. b4 Rc8 10.
Be2 h6 11. h3 g5 12. Bh2 Bg7 13. Nf3 O-O 14. O-O Ne4 15. Nxe4 Bxe4 16. Nd2 Bg6
17. Nb3 e5 18. dxe5 Bxe5 19. Bxe5 Nxe5 20. f4 Bd3 21. fxe5 Bxe2 22. Rf6 Rce8
23. Nd4 Bd3 24. Rd1 Be4 25. e6 fxe6 26. Rxh6 e5 27. Ne6 Rf5 28. Rf1 d4 29. exd4
Rxf1+ 30. Kxf1 Bd5 31. Nxg5 exd4 32. Rh4 d3 33. Rd4 Re2 34. Rxd3 Rxb2 35. Rg3
Rxb4 36. Ne4+ Kf8 37. Nd6 a5 38. Ra3 a4 39. g4 Ke7 40. Ke2 b5 41. g5 Rb2+ 42.
Ke3 Rb1 43. Nf5+ Ke6 44. Nd4+ Ke5 {0-1 (44) Teglas,B (2172)-Deak,F (2259)
Hungary 2009}) 9. b4 {proactively reinforcing c5 and preventing a7-a5.} b5 $2 {
this is exactly what Black should not do in this position, giving White an
inroad on the queenside; luckily, my opponent did not recognize the
opportunity.} (9... Nh5 10. Bc7 Rc8 11. Be5 a6 $14) 10. cxb6 $6 (10. Ra6 $1 $18
{targeting the now-vulnerable c-pawn is winning for White.}) 10... Nxb6 $14 {
obviously this is what I had intended on move 9. The c-pawn is now backward,
but White has issues with her b-pawns being weak as well.} 11. b5 c5 {
naturally not exchanging on b5, which would give White a great post for a
minor piece and open up the c-file.} 12. Nf3 Nfd7 13. Ne5 Nxe5 $6 {despite my
previous move, which was aimed at reinforcing both c5 and e5, this piece
exchange is not a good follow-up. Afterwards White's minor pieces are improved
in relative terms versus mine.} (13... cxd4 14. exd4 Bd6 {the key idea in this
line. Now another piece is developed and White's hold on the center is
challenged.} 15. Nxd7 Kxd7 16. Bxd6 Kxd6 17. Be2 $11) 14. Bxe5 $16 {Komodo
likes White's position better, with the central Be5 a significant constraint
on my play, including pressuring g7 and preventing my bishop from being
developed to its best diagonal on d6.} Kd7 {mobilizing the king with the
reduced material on the board is now more important than seeking to castle.
There is also no good way to protect the g-pawn without giving White further
advantage in space and development on the queenside.} 15. Be2 {not the most
challenging move.} (15. dxc5 Bxc5 16. Bxg7 Rhg8 $16) 15... f6 $14 {taking care
of the threat to g7.} 16. Bg3 cxd4 17. exd4 Bd6 18. Bxd6 Kxd6 $14 {my opponent
apparently felt that safe exchanges and a slight plus were a better route to
victory. White maintains some slight advantages on the queenside, but no
longer has urgent threats, so I felt much better about my position.} 19. g4 {
a rather direct approach which does not gain White anything.} Bg6 20. f4 e5 {
this time, I recognize the value of the pawn break. The next sequence is
essentially forced.} 21. dxe5+ fxe5 22. fxe5+ (22. f5 Bf7 {is fine for Black,
with two connected passed pawns in the center offsetting White's kingside
majority.}) 22... Kxe5 $11 {and now Black has a new passed pawn on d5. White
will have to pay attention to neutralizing it, rather than advancing her own
plans.} 23. Bf3 Be4 $6 {an unnecessary exchange that potentially weakens the
central pawn's position.} (23... d4 $5 {is the more aggressive choice:} 24.
Bxa8 dxc3 25. bxc3 Rxa8 26. O-O $11) (23... Raf8 $11) 24. Nxe4 $6 {following
the general rule of exchanging knights for bishops, but here it helps me.} (24.
Bxe4 $5 {is the better choice.} dxe4 25. O-O $16) 24... dxe4 $15 25. Bg2 Nc4 {
making an obvious threat, but not a significant one.} (25... Rhf8 $5 {is
actually the key move, mobilizing the rook and preparing ...Rf4.} 26. Rf1 Rxf1+
27. Bxf1 Kf4 $15) 26. Ra4 {now White is more active again and I am on the
defensive.} Nd6 27. O-O Rhb8 $6 (27... g6 {is necessary to reduce 7th rank
threats from White's rook on the f-file.}) 28. Re1 {White evidently does not
see the following sequence, a good example of CCT in action:} (28. Bxe4 $5 {
the pawn is protected twice and attacked twice, but} Nxe4 29. Rf5+ Kd6 30. Rd4+
Ke6 31. Rxe4+ Kd6 32. Rd4+ Ke6 33. b4 $14 {with pressure, although the doubled
extra b-pawn may not be decisive.}) 28... Rxb5 $11 {the correct choice, to
reach a completely level position where White has no more real threats.} 29.
Bxe4 Nxe4 30. Rexe4+ Kf6 31. b4 Rab8 32. h4 g5 33. Ra6+ R5b6 1/2-1/2
22 May 2018
Why Aronian Plays the English
1.c4
In recent times I have taken a liking to this move. After all, in the main openings too much is already known, and contortions such as 1.d4 and, after any move, 2. Bf4 do not yet attract me. It only remains to rely on the openings of my early youth - the English and the Reti.
-- GM Levon Aronian, New In Chess 2016 #4
(From the introduction to Aronian's annotations to Aronian-Carlsen, Stavanger 2016 round 8)
[Event "Norway Chess 4th"]
[Site "Stavanger"]
[Date "2016.04.28"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Aronian, Levon"]
[Black "Carlsen, Magnus"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A11"]
[WhiteElo "2784"]
[BlackElo "2851"]
[PlyCount "61"]
[EventDate "2016.04.19"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[EventRounds "9"]
[EventCountry "NOR"]
[EventCategory "21"]
[SourceTitle "CBM 172"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2016.05.12"]
[SourceVersion "1"]
[SourceVersionDate "2016.05.12"]
[SourceQuality "1"]
1. c4 Nf6 2. g3 c6 3. Bg2 d5 4. Nf3 g6 5. b3 Bg7 6. Bb2 O-O 7. O-O dxc4 8. bxc4
c5 9. d3 Nc6 10. Ne5 Na5 11. Qc1 Qc7 12. Nd2 Ne8 13. f4 Nd6 14. Bc3 Rb8 15. Qa3
b6 16. Bxa5 bxa5 17. Nb3 Nb7 18. Bxb7 Qxb7 19. Nxc5 Qc7 20. d4 Rd8 21. Rfd1 f6
22. Nf3 e5 23. fxe5 fxe5 24. Nxe5 Bxe5 25. dxe5 Rxd1+ 26. Rxd1 Qxe5 27. Rd8+
Kf7 28. Qf3+ Bf5 29. Rxb8 Qxb8 30. g4 Qb4 31. Nd3 1-0
20 May 2018
Annotated Game #187: Taking on the "Sniper" with a reloader tactic
(Note: this replaces a previous, duplicated Annotated Game #187)
In the following tournament game, my opponent uses the "Sniper" formation, which was popularized first in a 2011 book then a 2017 ChessBase DVD by FM Charlie Storey. You can read in more depth about it in the previous links, but basically the idea is to have a system as Black with ...g6, ...Bg7 and ...c5 to meet all of White's options. Since this formation is a component of some more mainline opening systems, it's not an entirely untrodden path in the opening, although it is an original approach.
Against the English Opening, I don't think the "Sniper" has as much bite, primarily because the key ...c5 pawn move for Black isn't as challenging when White does not yet have a pawn center built up. Here we get into a Symmetrical English, which is not really what Sniper players are looking to do, and as White by move 9 I feel I have a comfortable, active game.
The turning point of the game is a "reloader" tactic that I spotted the potential for, involving a sacrificial knight fork on g5 that gains me a pawn and a lasting advantage, although I give it back temporarily before my opponent gets too greedy with pawn-grabbing and neglects his king position, allowing me to break through with tactics involving forks, pins and sacrifices.
In the following tournament game, my opponent uses the "Sniper" formation, which was popularized first in a 2011 book then a 2017 ChessBase DVD by FM Charlie Storey. You can read in more depth about it in the previous links, but basically the idea is to have a system as Black with ...g6, ...Bg7 and ...c5 to meet all of White's options. Since this formation is a component of some more mainline opening systems, it's not an entirely untrodden path in the opening, although it is an original approach.
Against the English Opening, I don't think the "Sniper" has as much bite, primarily because the key ...c5 pawn move for Black isn't as challenging when White does not yet have a pawn center built up. Here we get into a Symmetrical English, which is not really what Sniper players are looking to do, and as White by move 9 I feel I have a comfortable, active game.
The turning point of the game is a "reloader" tactic that I spotted the potential for, involving a sacrificial knight fork on g5 that gains me a pawn and a lasting advantage, although I give it back temporarily before my opponent gets too greedy with pawn-grabbing and neglects his king position, allowing me to break through with tactics involving forks, pins and sacrifices.
[Event "?"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "ChessAdmin"]
[Black "Class B"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A34"]
[Annotator "ChessAdmin/Komodo 10"]
[PlyCount "65"]
[EventType "simul"]
[EventRounds "6"]
1. c4 g6 2. Nf3 Bg7 3. Nc3 c5 {known as the "Sniper" formation. Without a pawn
on d4, however, it does not have independent importance.} 4. g3 Nf6 5. Bg2 {
now we're in more familiar Symmetrical English territory.} O-O 6. O-O d5 {
a more aggressive continuation than maintaining symmetry with ...Nc6. I am
fine with exchanging the central pawn and opening the h1-a8 diagonal, however.}
7. cxd5 Nxd5 8. Qb3 {the second most popular continuation in the database. I
liked the idea of hitting b7 and getting my queen on a good diagonal early.} (
8. Nxd5 {is more popular, for example in this game by Kramnik:} Qxd5 9. d3 Nc6
10. Be3 Bxb2 11. Rb1 Bg7 12. Qa4 Qd7 13. Bxc5 b6 14. Be3 Nd4 15. Qd1 Bb7 16.
Nxd4 Bxg2 17. Kxg2 Bxd4 18. Bxd4 Qxd4 19. Qb3 Rac8 20. Rfc1 Rc5 21. e3 Qd6 22.
d4 Ra5 23. Rc2 e5 24. Rd1 Rd8 25. Rcd2 Qd5+ 26. Qxd5 {1/2-1/2 (26) Kramnik,V
(2801)-Grischuk,A (2761) Moscow 2012}) 8... Nb6 9. d3 {needed to release the
bishop. The d4 square is dominated by Black, but I nonetheless have
comfortable development.} Be6 {taking the diagonal for his own, but in the
process blocking any idea of advancing the e-pawn.} 10. Qc2 h6 {taking the g5
square away from the Nf3 (and the Bc1). However, Black is starting to get
behind in development.} 11. Be3 {developing and targeting the c-pawn, which is
isolated from its natural support (the b-pawn) by the Nb6.} Qc8 12. Rfd1 {
here I thought for a while, as I saw no obvious plan for White. The rooks
seemed to be to be well placed on the d- and c-files, so I decided to continue
development that way.} Rd8 {in order to oppose the idea of my advancing the
d-pawn.} 13. Rac1 $14 {by this point Komodo gives White a small plus. I have
all of my pieces developed, while Black's queenside remains partially
undeveloped. The c-pawn also remains a target, which my opponent recognizes
with his next move.} Na6 14. a3 {making sure the Na6 does not come into b4,
and also removing the a-pawn from the Be6's pressure.} Bh3 15. Bh1 {the engine
ranks higher pretty much any alternative to this move, which preserves the
bishop. At the time, I felt that its influence over the long diagonal was
worth maintaining.} (15. Ne4 Bxg2 16. Kxg2 Nd5 17. Bxc5 {doesn't get White
very much after} f5 18. Ned2 Qxc5 19. Qxc5 Nxc5 20. Rxc5 Bxb2 21. Nc4 Bf6) (15.
Bxh3 Qxh3 16. Qb3 $14 {and now White has more play on the light squares with
the Black bishop's absence, although it hardly seems decisive.}) 15... Qd7 16.
Qd2 {threatening h6.} Kh7 {this obvious-looking move turns out to be a problem
for Black.} (16... g5 $5) 17. Ne4 {this attacks both c5 and g5, with potential
tacticsr on both squares. My opponent did not see the threat on g5, however.}
Qb5 $2 {neglecting protection of the now-hanging Bh3.} (17... Be6 {appears to
be the best option, as it's not so simple for White to take on c5.} 18. Nxc5
Nxc5 19. Rxc5 Na4 20. Ra5 Nxb2 21. Rc1 {although now despite the material
equality there is still a plus for White because of the a-pawn weakness,
Black's more awkward piece placement, and the Bh1's influence. For example} b6
22. Ne5 Qe8 23. Bxa8 bxa5 24. Bc6 Qh8 25. Qxb2 Bxe5 26. Qb5 $14) 18. Nfg5+ {
a genuine "reloader" tactic! The knight fork on g5 is repeated.} hxg5 19. Nxg5+
Kg8 20. Nxh3 $16 {now I am a clear pawn up with no compensation for Black. I
also am eyeing Black's weakened king position.} Nd5 {making my next move
choice with the Be3 that much easier.} 21. Bh6 Qxb2 22. Qg5 $6 {here I was
disappointed that my opponent had found a way to regain the pawn, and I
overlooked how to continue with an advantage.} (22. Qxb2 Bxb2 23. Rb1 Bxa3 24.
Rxb7 $16 {preserves the advantage, although it's not immediately obvious to a
Class player (i.e. me) during the visualization/calculation process. The
immediate threat is Ra1, winning a piece as both the Na6 and Ba3 are hanging.
Black can avoid this, but the a7 pawn is also underprotected. Play could
continue} Nab4 {(also protecting against Bxd5 followed by Rxe7)} 25. Bxd5 Nxd5
26. Ra1 Bb4 27. Raxa7 $16 {and I'm back to being a clear pawn up.}) 22... Bf6
$11 23. Qg4 Qxa3 $2 {this is simply greedy and gives me back the initiative
and an advantage.} (23... Nc3 $11) 24. Be4 $1 {threatening to sacrifice on g6.}
Kh7 $2 (24... Bg7 25. Bxg7 Kxg7 26. Nf4 $16 {and the attack continues.}) (24...
Qa4 {pinning the Be4 seems to be the best practical chance for Black.} 25. Nf4
Nxf4 26. Bxf4 $16) 25. Qh5 {after a good deal of thought, this seemed to me to
be the best follow-up, taking advantage of the pinned g6 pawn. Komodo agrees.}
Rh8 26. Qxd5 Kxh6 27. Qxf7 $18 {material is equal but Black's king is under
heavy pressure.} Rag8 28. Nf4 (28. Qe6 {is the idea behind a quicker route to
victory by repositioning the queen.}) 28... Rg7 29. Qd5 b6 $6 {protects
against the pawn snatching threat, but neglects the king.} 30. Bxg6 $1 e5 {
a nice try on defense, blocking the route to h5, but the queen can reposition
to again threaten the square.} 31. Qf3 Rxg6 32. Qh5+ Kg7 33. Qxg6+ 1-0
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

