06 June 2026

FT article: (Chess fan) George Russell talks tactics and sharing a garage with the teenage F1 leader

 

Along with other recent pop culture references about chess, it's interesting to track the image of chess (and chessplayers) projected in the media. For example, the print version of the Financial Times on June 5 had a leader (see above screenshot) "Chess fan George Russell plots his next move after early setbacks" for the article George Russell talks tactics and sharing a garage with the teenage F1 leader

The online version linked above does not mention chess in the leader, and there's relatively little about it in the article itself - only a mention of how driver George Russell likes to be competitive off the Formula 1 circuit as well, playing a lot of online chess. Chess is nonetheless associated with strategic thinking, competitiveness, and glamorous international sport. For we chessplayers (amateur or professional), this type of positive halo effect is always nice to see.

In the spirit of this blog's periodic training quotes of the day, here's one from the article that is worth considering:

“The way I looked at it is that every season before this, when I wasn’t fighting for a championship, my objective was always to get the most out of every single day on track,” he says. “Whether that meant fighting for victory or only fighting for fifth position, the goal was always the same: drive as fast as possible and maximise the things I can control.

“That approach led me to this point in my career, where I’m now fighting for a championship, so why should I change anything?”

30 May 2026

Pop culture chess imagery: 007 First Light

 

Source:
https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/1tq3skr/the_position_in_the_new_007_first_light_game/

As an addition to previous commentary on pop culture chess imagery, thanks to @IMPERATOR_63 on Reddit (link above) there is now a new entry from the recently-released 007 First Light video game. The virtual setting is clearly a throwback/callout to the From Russia With Love chess tournament scene, although with a modernized board display. So props to the developers for that.

Of course with pop culture, it seems there is always something wrong with the depiction of chess. Here the row numbering is reversed, with A8 being in the lower-left corner. At least the position itself (if you ignore the coordinates) is a real one.

27 May 2026

Training quote of the day #61: Dalton Perrine

From FM Dalton Perrine's Substack post "The Most Common Mistakes Chess Coaches Make (According to Chess Coaches)"

What’s Hard to Teach but Actually Works

...

Fixing how a student thinks during a game. Getting them to think in concrete moves and sequences rather than in vague principles and words. Working on the mental side: how they handle frustration, how they recover from a loss, how they show up to a tournament on day three when they’re tired and behind. Raising the floor of their play before chasing the ceiling, because rating reflects your average performance and your worst games drag the average down harder than your best games lift it.

12 May 2026

Annotated Game #344: White wins again

In this final round game, I had only my second White in five games, with the pattern so far in the tournament of White winning in all of them. I certainly hoped that trend would continue.

My opponent was evidently unfamiliar with the Colle, but still did a creditable job in the opening, leaving the database on move 8. While I had a slight plus after that due to more space on the queenside, it was nothing special. Black's key error was a simple piece exchange, which is another object lesson in the mastery concept of the effects of piece exchanges. After that, my attack was sufficient to crash through my opponent's limited kingside defenses. Another victory for an initially unassuming-looking Colle.

[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "ChessAdmin"] [Black "Class C"] [Result "1-0"] [Annotator "ChessAdmin/Dragon 3.2"] [ECO "D05"] [WhiteFideId "-1"] [BlackFideId "-1"] [PlyCount "45"] [GameId "2280365257781313"] 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 e6 3. e3 Nf6 {my opponent took some time on his last two moves, indicating he was not familiar with facing the Colle.} 4. Bd3 Nbd7 5. Nbd2 {I judged this the most flexible move-order, keeping control of e4.} c5 6. b3 cxd4 7. exd4 Bd6 8. Bb2 a5 {now out of the database.} 9. a4 $14 {this seemed the logical response, preventing a5-a4 which would be disruptive, and controlling b5.} b6 10. O-O (10. Qe2 {would prevent the ...Ba6 idea, which appears later.}) 10... O-O 11. Re1 Re8 12. Ne5 Ba6 13. Qe2 (13. c4 $5 {is clearly better, preserving the bishop from exchange and getting the c-pawn into the fight.}) 13... Nb8 $6 {Black should just go ahead and exchange off the Bd3.} 14. c4 {I thought about this for a while, unhappy that my excellently-placed Bd3 would eventually be exchanged off. Then it occurred to me that this need not happen, by playing the text move.} (14. Bb5 $5 $14 {is an interesting alternative. The point is that after} Bxb5 15. axb5 {White controls c6 and a6, While Black cannot get at the b5 pawn easily.}) 14... Bxe5 $4 {this simple-looking exchange loses for Black, as his kingside defenses are stripped away.} 15. dxe5 $1 $18 dxc4 {evidently this was my opponent's idea, which I had foreseen.} 16. bxc4 {for Black, the Ba6 is now out of play and the Nf6 is forced away from the king's defense.} Nfd7 17. Qh5 {I had a long think here, looking for a knockout blow. This is good enough to win, but not the most decisive move.} (17. Bxh7+ $1 {it is important to always look to see if this bishop sac on h7 can be played.} Kxh7 18. Qh5+ Kg8 19. Ra3 $1 {a key rook lift idea, which I had missed.} Nc5 20. Rh3 Kf8 21. Ne4 Nxe4 22. Rxe4 {the Qh5 covers the mate threat on d1.} Ke7 23. Rf4 $18) (17. Qe4 {initially looked attractive, forking the Ra8 and the mating square on h7. According to the engine it would have been another winning option, but ultimately I judged it did not work as well as the text move, instead offering Black at least a semblance of counterplay.} Nf8 18. Qxa8 Qxd3 $18) 17... h6 (17... g6 18. Qh6 {is what I primarily looked at during the game, and correctly concluded that the Nd2 could then decisively enter the attack via e4 or f3.}) 18. Ne4 $1 {bringing the knight into the attack via a central square.} Nc5 19. Nd6 (19. Nf6+ {I also looked at seriously, and is preferred by the engine. Howeer, I could not fully visualize its effects, so opted for the text move to continue the attack.} gxf6 20. Bh7+ Kxh7 21. Qxf7+ Kh8 22. Qg6 f5 23. Qxh6+ Kg8 24. Re3 $18) 19... Nxd3 {taking the material is just a distraction for Black, making it easier for me.} (19... Re7 20. Re3 $18 {was my planned continuation.}) (19... Rf8 20. Bb1 Qg5 21. Qe2 $18 {it is easy for the engine to retreat like this and still keep the pressure up, a good lesson for humans. Ra3-g3 is coming and the bishops and queen are still part of the kingside attack.}) 20. Qxf7+ {I assessed Black was lost after this.} Kh8 21. Nxe8 {threatening mate on g7.} Qg5 22. Bc1 (22. h4 {is more forcing, as the queen cannot move away from defending g7.}) 22... Nxc1 23. Raxc1 {and with more material loss on the way, my opponent resigned.} 1-0

05 May 2026

How Carlsen makes us feel better about chess V

From comments made by GM Magnus Carlsen after his round 5 win at the TePe Sigegman Chess 2026 event. (Source: Chess.com)
"It was incredibly shaky! I thought early on that I was doing alright, but I couldn’t figure it out, and then I lost the thread. I think she [GM Zhu Jiner] completely outplayed me for a while there—I didn’t like what was going on at all."
Carlsen admitted his 14.Nh4?! was "really a bit too much," explaining, "I just didn't know what to do and I was down to 26 minutes or something, and having no idea what my plans were."