This final-round game is another ugly win, making a trio for the tournament. I felt better about it than the others, however, since the middlegame was more interesting and I got into a losing position only after missing an excellent attacking continuation at a critical point (move 25). After that, I needlessly panicked as White got the initiative, then landed some hard blows against my position. My practical decision-making was good, however, in that I kept posing White problems, which eventually he failed to solve in the best way, thereby letting me back into the game. The denouement comes after a crucial bid for counterplay is allowed to succeed by White, then I force a transition into a winning queen endgame.
An examination of training and practical concepts for the improving chessplayer
21 July 2026
Annotated Game #351: Completing a trilogy of ugly wins
18 July 2026
Annotated Game #350: Another ugly win ftw
The trajectory of this next tournament game could be viewed as a mashup of the previous several games analyzed - being an ugly come-from-behind win, in which I am able to grab the initiative in a very equal position and then make life difficult for my opponent, who goes wrong tactically in the end. The game itself was a useful learning experience for me as White in a King's Indian Defense, which the Colle can transpose to. I obtained a significant plus out of the opening (see moves 10-17) but then squandered it by allowing counterplay by Black on the queenside. The rest of the game becomes a back-and-forth roller coaster.
(I mention in the annotations not choosing a couple of "good enough" moves - see IM Junta Ikeda's related Substack post here: https://juntaikeda.substack.com/p/20-40-good-enough-moves)
12 July 2026
Annotated Game #349: Equal is not the same as easy
This second-round tournament game had a different trajectory from the previous two. Instead of having to rally after being significantly worse (and then winning), in this game as White I pass up various opportunities to gain a small advantage, as well as miss spotting a good tactic, keeping things very equal for almost the entire game. I would say there was too much play by rote early on, then perhaps a lack of ambition after that.
The other main issue was taking too much time with largely meaningless calculations on each move, in that the evaluation was not significantly different after many of them, regardless of the choice. This meant that near the end of the game I was down to only a few minutes and was in the position of responding to my opponent's initiative for too many moves. It only takes one miscalcuation or bad idea to give away the game, and that's what happened here. Engine evaluations of "equal" is not the same thing as "easy" to play, which this game is an excellent example of. My opponent did well to try to create practical chances in the latter part of the game, which gave me the opportunity to go wrong.
06 July 2026
Annotated Game #348: A familiar trajectory
In this first-round tournament game, my opponent essays the Advance Variation against my Caro-Kann, which these days is considered the most challenging try for White. While I play the opening generally correctly, I over-correct for my normal materialistic bias by postponing capturing the e5 pawn for too long, giving my opponent a strong attack. The trajectory of the game is similar to that of Annotated Game #347, as White dissipates the attacking tension too soon and lets me back in the game, albeit having inflicted some positional damage in the process. I then find a move which flips the game narrative and suddenly my pieces come to life, with a winning advantage. There are some tactics involved and I was glad to be able to calculate correctly the sequence that sealed the victory, which included giving back a piece in exchange for a winning major piece attack.
05 July 2026
Training quote of the day #65: Viswanathan Anand
From Mind Master: Winning Lessons From A Champion's Life by GM Viswanathan Anand:
Motivation, I believe, ebbs and flows to its own rhythms and might have nothing to do with the effort we put into feeling it or the control we attempt to exercise over it. I’ve found that I’ve played my most inspired games when my enthusiasm for the sport resurfaced, without the bindings of titles or wins or ratings tying me down, and I’ve just wanted to play a good game and have been excited about learning something new or applying something fresh. There’s no quick path to finding motivation, but the moment you surrender to your love for your sport – or your career or choice of activity, for that matter – is where the highest probability lies.
04 July 2026
Annotated Game #347: First victory in the Dutch Defense
It took three tries, but this final-round tournament game was my first victory as a "pure" Dutch Defense player (after 1. d4 f5). The previous (second time) was in Annotated Game #343, when I faced the 2. Bg5 sideline. Here I face the other main sideline, with 2. Nc3 followed by 3. Bg5. The main difference is that the move-order allows Black to play 2...Nf6 first, which significantly changes the dynamics. Although I mis-remember the standard line afterwards (3...d5), I get a reasonable game; it is nice to know that even in the Dutch the moves are not necessarily on knife-edge all the time. One significant flaw was 8...Kf7?!, an idea that was repeated (if not quite as horribly) from the previous game, so that is something to remember.
After that, my opponent got some early pressure with an h-pawn advance, but then - as often occurs at the Class level - she prematurely dissipated the tension, so I was able to equalize without difficulty. By around move 18 the position is largely symmetrical and I felt was rather boring, so I tried to spice things up on the h-file, misjudging my strategic chances there and also having board vision problems with the blunder 21...Rh6? My opponent evidently was also bored with the position and tried to be aggressive with 22. c4?! which makes the situation complex and allowed me to go astray. There is a lot of tactical back-and-forth afterwards, which I'll leave to the game annotations, but basically I held on until I spotted a winning tactic and turned the tables on my opponent. Perhaps this was a fitting way to obtain a first win in the Dutch.
03 July 2026
Annotated Game #346: Passive materialism is bad
This second-round tournament game features an interesting Colle vs. Queen's Indian setup. Black is a little over-aggressive in the opening, but I am not able to keep the small advantage obtained as a result. My opponent then doubles down on the aggression with 16...f4? - I initially respond correctly, but then make a far too materialistic decision to play passively, instead of dynamically with a significant advantage. Black continues to actively press and his attack essentially plays itself, as a result. An object lesson in the superior dynamic value of pieces.