You know it's bad when The Onion does a story on you losing at chess:
https://theonion.com/befuddled-magnus-carlsen-bested-by-dreaded-checkmate-gambit/
An examination of training and practical concepts for the improving chessplayer
You know it's bad when The Onion does a story on you losing at chess:
https://theonion.com/befuddled-magnus-carlsen-bested-by-dreaded-checkmate-gambit/
I unexpectedly had two Whites in a row in this tournament, so was able to immediately rectify my error of an incorrect e3-e4 pawn push in Annotated Game #309 with an example of a correct e3-e4 pawn lever. The difference here is that Black closes the center early, making the pawn break possible since White's d-pawn cannot be undermined or exchanged as a result. My opponent then makes a tactical error which should have led to a loss, but I fritter away my advantage into an even endgame. A late blunder as we officially agreed a draw was bad, but given that I should have easily won earlier, perhaps it was just karma evening out.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChessAdmin | - | Class B | - | ½–½ | D00 |
In this next tournament game, I make two bad assumptions about a move being good, and am punished for it. The first one is the e3-e4 break in the Stonewall Attack, which has to be more carefully prepared. The second one is the result of a hallucination and assuming that I could escape a pawn fork, which in fact I could not. For whatever reason I was more mentally tired than I should have been during the game, which led to the unfortunate short-circuiting of my thinking process.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChessAdmin | - | Class A | - | 0–1 | D05 |
This next first-round tournament game was useful for my study of the Caro-Kann Exchange, which seems to be more popular lately (at least for the opponents I've been facing). If Black ignores his queenside counterplay for too long, as happens here, White can get some kingside momentum. After my opponent builds up what should be a winning attack, I decide to go all in on the counterplay for practical chances, aided by my opponent's time pressure. This pays off when I spot a key equalizing tactic, then hold on for the simplified endgame draw.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class A | - | ChessAdmin | - | ½–½ | B13 |
My main intention was to focus on typical plans and how to play the position-types reached, which was at least partially satisfied. Bologan is a Caro-Kann tournament player himself and this comes through in his comments and choices based on experience, not just pure analysis. As with any reference work, reviewing the lines using an up-to-date games database and engine in your own opening repertoire database is still necessary. This also makes the learning process an engaging one, rather than simply accepting the author's judgments on everything. It also helps to stimulate your own thinking and allows you to make your own personal choices, based on what you can understand in a position and is best suited for your style of play.
Here are some comments on his treatment of different parts of the Caro-Kann, from the point of view of an improving player:
Part I - Minor Lines:
"The Rating Obsession: Why It's Ruining Your Progress" over at Chess.com is an excellent article (and wakeup call for all improving players) about its title phenomenon. I think every serious chess improver has to grapple at least some of the time with the psychological problem of playing for rating, rather than playing for progress, which is a key point made by article author GM Gabuzyan. (One of the earliest posts here was on Ratings Fear and Loathing).
The full article is well worth the read, but this introductory excerpt really hit home:
One day, I nearly fell out of my chair during a 1-on-1 call with a new student.
The reason?
He told me, "I’m afraid to lose my rating."
I asked. "Alright. What’s your rating?"
A short silence. Then he said it.
"588."
The point is that this type of psychological affliction is common to all of us who take risks as players - something necessary to make progress - from beginners to IMs; GM Gabuzyan relates his own story about being 12 points shy of GM (2500) level and how he ultimately dealt with that. I don't think that we ever completely get rid of the rating monkey on our back, but we can certainly choose not to give our attention to it - and definitely should not listen to its advice.
After an early opening blunder led to a rapid loss in the penultimate round of the tournament, the following final-round game was a welcome point of stability. Both sides dance around entering the Colle System, with Black never committing to playing ...d5, while as White I pass up some more interesting alternatives on moves 12-13 that would have led either to a small positional plus, or a more imbalanced structure with attacking chances on the kingside. I correctly avoid a tempting-looking tactic later, but in a passive and slightly cramped way. Not my best game, but the careful road to a draw was still a positive outcome after the poor showing in the previous round, guaranteeing me a plus score for the tournament.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChessAdmin | - | - | ½–½ | A47 |
The Stonewall Attack has an undeserved reputation as a "system" opening, although perhaps some people do play the first several moves always by rote. As with its Dutch Stonewall counterpart as Black - see Annotated Game #305 - it is important to pay attention to move-order issues and not expect the same sequence to work every time against different setups from your opponent. However, in certain circumstances there is indeed a "formula" that usually works for White, which I am able to achieve in this next tournament game. Here I demonstrate that I finally have learned the lesson of the e-pawn lever in this position-type - after which, I have at worst a pleasant game, while giving my opponent a chance to mishandle the defense, which he does on move 15.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChessAdmin | - | Class B | - | 1–0 | D00 |
(Original Source: Raync910's blog at https://www.chess.com/blog/raync910/lady-gaga-coachella-poker-face-chess-dance-battle)
What's wrong with this picture? From Lady Gaga's performance at the Coachella festival:
That said, powerful use of the chess metaphor in dance and song.
(See also: Chess imagery in popular culture)
This first-round tournament game had two big lessons. First, it highlighted a hole in my repertoire involving the move-order used to reach a Dutch Stonewall; I'll have to fix that for the future. Second, it demonstrated why at the Class level one should always keep yourself alive with practical chances in an endgame. Here I reached a situation where my opponent was up the exchange and could have sacrificed it back to lock in a win, but instead I exploited the opening he gave me to threaten mate and collect most of his pieces, forcing a resignation. A good illustration of why materialism can lead to bad outcomes in all phases of the game.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class B | - | ChessAdmin | - | 0–1 | D31 |
Singhal said that at Waca they tried to think about “multiple intelligent perspectives . . . is there anything else that’s a little X Factor”. He noted the decision, unusual in the world of chess, to bring South African cricket coach Paddy Upton to help Dommaraju prepare mentally for the world championship.
This last-round tournament game follows a trajectory that is all too typical of many of my games: I play reasonably well in the opening, then neglect the possibility of a pawn break or two, then somehow end up with my pieces passively placed on the back ranks while my opponent gains space. In this Caro-Kann Classical, however, I manage to find just enough activity and then open things up in the endgame, for an almost but not-quite win. In fact White may have had more chances, but I demonstrate how to use my bishop as a long-range piece effectively versus his knight, and thereby seal the draw.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class C | - | ChessAdmin | - | ½–½ | B19 |
I recently completed John Nunn's Best Games 1985-1993 (Batsford Chess Library, 1995), annotated by the author. GM Nunn is one of the chess world's most accomplished and interesting authors, and has been referenced multiple times on this blog. Some of his other works are specifically aimed at improving players; this is not one of them.
I would say it falls into a similar category as Victor Korchnoi's best games collection - these high-level annotated games are similarly high-quality, but have relatively little hand-holding for Class-level players. The benefit of studying annotated games collections from the author's own perspective is that you get a unique window into both their chess-related thought process and general psychological factors affecting the game. Nunn's thought process insights are uneven in their level of detail, but in many of the games he does provide more of an explanation of the positions' key characteristics and his evaluations, making them very pertinent for improving players. The biographical details are both personally interesting and lend useful context into his state of mind for each tournament and game, although the chess politics comments are now mostly irrelevant.
One theme that struck me while reviewing the games was Nunn's mastery of evaluation of compensation, which involves understanding positional factors that outweigh the material balance, in the absence of forcing tactics. His comments in that regard I found particularly useful, and are not something you can easily find in chess training material. Nunn's games were also routinely very tactical and combative, with a lot of King's Indian and Sicilian games, so there was plenty of material there as well for understanding tactical concepts, visualization and calculation.
I'll close this with an example of one of Nunn's games (number 34 in the collection) that I think very well illustrates his mastery of compensation for sacrificed material.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nunn,J | 2610 | Nikolic,P | 2625 | 1–0 | C19 |
The next tournament game illustrates how well one can be placed out of the opening, in this case a Stonewall Attack, and yet fail to convert a positional advantage. By move 13 my pieces were dominant and by move 18 I could effectively have been winning on both the queenside and kingside. Unfortunately a mishandled attack, which could at least have led to a perpetual check, failed and Black emerged with a winning material advantage.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChessAdmin | - | Class B | - | 0–1 | D00 |
There is a saying that all rook endings are drawn - obviously not meant literally, but the idea is correct that with an active major piece, the defender can often draw even when down material, so should not despair. Queen endings are even more complicated and tricky for Class players, who are unlikely to know the key ideas or be able to calculate the greater possibilities for checks.
This next tournament game has some useful observations in the opening (a Caro-Kann Exchange) and middlegame phases, especially regarding the interplay between defense and counterplay possibilities. However, the main feature becomes the ending, which seesaws back-and-forth until I calculate out the correct K+P sequence to draw, after missing a win (which my opponent did as well).
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class B | - | ChessAdmin | - | ½–½ | B13 |
This next first-round tournament game demonstrated multiple themes in analysis, which are worth remembering for the long term:
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChessAdmin | - | Expert | - | 0–1 | E61 |
From John Nunn's Best Games 1985-1993, Batsford Chess Library, 1995:
Initiating tactics when you have a serious positional disadvantage usually results in an early train home.
(From the annotations to game 30 in the collection, comment made after Black's move 24.)
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nunn,J | 2600 | Howell,J | 2450 | 1–0 | B81 |
In analyzing this final-round tournament game, what struck me about it - other than yet again my failure to play the e3-e4 pawn break at the right time - was how quickly the game turned once I lost the initiative as White. The opening is unusual, but I come out of it in reasonable shape. The missed chance to play e3-e4 was the first inflection point in losing the initiative, but it really hurts only when my opponent targets the queenside pawn weaknesses I had ignored, once I had foolishly fixed the center by advancing the c-pawn. The collapse afterwards of White's structure is both quick and instructive.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChessAdmin | - | Class C | - | 0–1 | D00 |
The below third-round tournament game is thematically similar to Annotated Game #294, in which White first presses Black - this time in a Panov variation of the Caro-Kann - then missteps, not sensing the danger. This is typically what Black is going for in the Caro-Kann overall, being patient and then seizing counterplay when it becomes available. Here I deliberately chose the most dynamic middlegame plan on move 13, after a long think, which is what opens up the opportunity later on for White to stumble.
Move | N | Result | Elo | Players |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
White | EloW | Black | EloB | Res | ECO | Rnd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class C | - | ChessAdmin | - | 0–1 | B14 |